Gumloop starts free, with paid tiers from $37/month for 10,000 credits. But it isn’t easy to understand how credits are used. Whether you're automating lead enrichment, scraping workflows, or internal ops, pricing should be transparent, so you know what you're paying for.
In this article, we’ll cover:
Let’s first break down the pricing of Gumloop.
Gumloop uses a credit-based pricing model that scales based on usage. It’s for users who want flexible automation and don’t mind monitoring their credit consumption. Here's how the plans break down in 2026:
All plans renew monthly. There’s no mention of annual discounts or prepay incentives on their site.
Gumloop is transparent about what each tier includes, but credit-based pricing adds complexity. Each AI model or action consumes a certain number of credits. You’ll use 2 credits for a standard AI call and 20 credits for an advanced AI call, using GPT-4.1 or Claude Sonnet 3.7. Flow runs, scraping steps, and enrichment nodes also eat into your balance.
Here’s a quick summary of what each plan includes:
Next up, we'll break down what you're getting with each plan.
Credits tell you how much you can do. But the value of each Gumloop plan also depends on what you can access, build, and scale as your workflows grow. Here’s a breakdown:
It’s good for exploring the platform. You get 2,000 credits, 2 concurrent flows, and 2 list steps. You can build basic automations, but anything complex will eat through credits quickly. Support is forum-based only.
This plan unlocks the ability to connect API keys, use 5 list steps, and access custom nodes. It still supports only 1 seat, which limits team use. Feature request priority is low.
Here’s where it starts to make sense for teams. You get 10 seats, 15 list steps, workspaces for collaboration, Slack support, and more credits to handle multi-step, AI-heavy flows. If you’re working with cross-functional teams, this tier unlocks most of what you need.
You can customize everything: seats, workflows, and list steps. It’s ideal for companies with compliance requirements, internal dev teams, or higher volume automation needs. It includes hosted LLMs, audit logs, SSO, and dedicated support.
Complex workflows will consume around 20-60 credits per call using GPT-4.1, Claude Opus, or enrichment nodes. Each flow run and list step adds to that total. Gumloop supports integrations like Gmail, Slack, Airtable, and CRMs, but credits are deducted per interaction.
Support also varies by tier. Only Team and Enterprise users get real-time help, while Free and Solo rely on their channels for support.
So if you're automating as a team or scaling usage, upgrades become less of a nice-to-have and more of a need.
Next, we explore the use cases that suit Gumloop the best.
Gumloop caters to users who want control and flexibility, especially those comfortable with modular systems and node-based logic.
Let’s cover some of the feedback users have left on the internet. Here’s what they have to say:
If you're comparing tools for technical users vs broader teams, this Gumloop vs Make comparison breaks down those differences well.
Next, let’s see how Gumloop stacks up against other AI automation tools like Zapier, Bardeen, and Lindy.
There are lots of AI agent automation platforms out there. If you're deciding between tools like Gumloop, Lindy, Zapier, or Bardeen, here’s how they compare across a few key areas.
Gumloop is all about building from scratch. You piece together flows using nodes, which gives you maximum control but also a higher learning curve.
Lindy, on the other hand, offers ready-to-use templates to handle email follow-ups, meeting scheduling, or lead generation out of the box. For teams that want fast deployment, this is a big plus.
Zapier is template-driven too — great for getting started, but it’s better suited for automating simple workflows. Meanwhile, Bardeen gives you browser-based templates, like scraping LinkedIn or auto-filling spreadsheets, but they still require setup.
Each tool covers workflows differently. Here’s how:
Their pricing models are more or less similar, with small differences. Here’s how they differ:
The bottom line: If you're looking to build multi-channel flows that integrate across CRMs, email, docs, and meetings, Lindy’s integrations and prebuilt templates can save a lot of time.
If you want affordable AI automations, consider Lindy. It’s an intuitive AI automation platform that lets you build your own AI agents for loads of tasks.
You’ll find plenty of pre-built templates and loads of integrations to choose from.
Here’s why Lindy can be a great option:
The Free plan includes 2,000 credits, 5 concurrent flows, and forum support. Solo plan adds 10,000 credits, 1 user seat, access to API keys, 5 list steps, and low-priority feature requests.
Gumloop’s model is credit-based, not strictly usage-based. While you pay for a monthly credit quota, heavy AI workflows or scraping can quickly burn through it.
Yes, it is. The Free and Solo plans work the best for individuals. Team collaboration starts with the Team tier at $244/month.
Yes, you can. Gumloop is built for custom logic via drag-and-drop nodes. You can integrate AI models, APIs, scraping, and more into your workflows.
Not as such, but the variability in credit consumption means workflows can cost more than expected, especially if you use expensive nodes like GPT-4 or enrichment tools.
Some top options include:
Gumloop offers flexibility but requires hands-on setup and credit tracking. Lindy focuses on no-code agents and broader integrations. Zapier is simpler, but less AI-focused.
Yes, Gumloop works well, if you need scraping or enrichment. But workflows get expensive quickly without careful credit monitoring.
If you’re confused, ask yourself:
Picking the right one depends on your technical comfort, goals, and team structure.

Lindy saves you two hours a day by proactively managing your inbox, meetings, and calendar, so you can focus on what actually matters.
